Twelve days of continuous airstrikes, cross-border missile launches, and digital escalation have, for now, come to an uneasy halt. On June 24, former U.S. President Donald Trump publicly declared a phased ceasefire agreement between Israel and Iran—his first major diplomatic intervention since re-entering the political spotlight. But while the headlines read “peace,” the situation on the ground suggests a far more precarious equilibrium.

Ceasefire on Paper, Chaos on the Ground

The ceasefire, brokered after behind-the-scenes negotiations involving Swiss, Qatari, and Turkish intermediaries, came as both nations faced mounting international pressure to de-escalate. In Washington, the re-emergence of Trump into the geopolitical stage marked a calculated return—not through campaign rallies, but through war diplomacy. His announcement, broadcast live, included an open rebuke of both nations for what he called “childish warmongering in a nuclear age.”

Yet within hours, Israeli defense forces reported renewed rocket fire from Iranian-linked militias near Be’er Sheva. In retaliation, Israeli jets struck a radar installation east of Tehran. Iranian officials denied involvement and condemned the strike as a breach of the ceasefire. The cycle, albeit muted, had resumed.

Avash Media, CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

The Strategic Optics Behind “Peace”

Ceasefires in the Middle East are rarely about peace. They are about repositioning. And this one is no different.

For Iran, the past weeks have demonstrated both capability and vulnerability. The country managed to strike targets across Iraq, the Golan Heights, and even challenged U.S. presence in Al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar. But it also suffered severe hits to its missile infrastructure and cyber defenses. Israel, on the other hand, flexed its technological edge—deploying advanced drone swarms and AI-targeting protocols—but faced domestic unrest and regional isolation.

The ceasefire is less about ending hostilities and more about calculated breathing space. Both states need time—to rearm, to realign their alliances, and to reposition themselves on the diplomatic chessboard.

U.S. Role and the Power Vacuum Dilemma

Trump’s involvement should not be seen in isolation. It highlights the power vacuum created by a hesitant Biden administration and an increasingly fractured NATO. Washington’s diplomatic machinery, often bogged down in bureaucracy, was outpaced by Trump’s impulsive yet effective style of intervention. However, critics argue that this form of diplomacy is unsustainable and fragile, as it lacks institutional backing and long-term planning.

Furthermore, the ceasefire fails to address the root causes—nuclear program fears, regional proxy wars, and cyber-espionage conflicts—leaving the powder keg intact.

Reading Between the Lines

This ceasefire doesn’t represent peace—it reflects pause. A tactical one. A necessary one. For defense observers, the coming weeks will be crucial. Watch for: