Digital Soldiers: How PMCs Wage Cyberwar

Imagine a world where wars are won not with boots on the ground, but with keystrokes in the dark. A rogue nation’s grid flickers out during a tense standoff, not from missiles, but from a silent breach orchestrated by a Virginia-based firm, its operators sipping coffee in air-conditioned offices while algorithms do the dirty work. This isn’t dystopian fiction; it’s the reality unfolding before our eyes, where private military companies have traded Humvees for hackers, and plausible deniability has become the ultimate weapon in geopolitical chess.

This article, written by Miralem Alic, explores how private military companies are reshaping modern cyber conflict.

The wars of yesterday bled on battlefields; today’s bleed through silent intrusions, data exfiltration, and disrupted grids. The controversial history of private contractors in kinetic operations, marked by high-profile incidents and subsequent rebrandings, serves as a reminder of how the industry adapts. But their true heirs now wield code as weapon, turning plausible deniability into an art form perfected in cyberspace. These digital mercenaries don’t storm compounds; they infiltrate them from afar, blending corporate efficiency with state-level aggression in a multibillion-dollar shadow industry that’s reshaping global conflict.

As we step into 2026, this evolution hits hyperdrive. Governments, burdened by bureaucracy and talent shortages, are outsourcing not just defense, but offense, to firms that promise speed, innovation, and zero fingerprints. Yet this Faustian bargain raises thorny questions: When private actors hold the keys to critical infrastructure hacks, who truly controls the battlefield? And what happens when profit motives collide with national security?

America’s Offensive Pivot: From Defense to Digital Aggression

As 2025 closes, the Trump administration has ignited a seismic shift. Buried in sweeping tax and spending legislation: a $1 billion infusion explicitly for offensive cyber operations, traditionally the domain of Cyber Command and intelligence agencies. The White House is set to formalize enlisting private firms for proactive strikes against state-sponsored hackers and ransomware empires. Discussions began under Biden but stalled; now, they’re accelerating with unapologetic intent.

Enter Twenty, the archetype of this new mercenary class. Founded in 2024 by ex-military who foresaw America’s offensive surge, Twenty secured up to $12.6 million from U.S. Cyber Command and Navy research funds by mid-2025 to develop AI-assisted tools that streamline network analysis and targeting workflows. Backed by In-Q-Tel (CIA’s venture arm) and heavyweights like General Catalyst, Twenty represents the kind of private innovation increasingly integrated into official efforts. Legacy giants: Leidos, Booz Allen, General Dynamics continue embedding advanced features into C4ISR systems, while historical concepts like “letters of marque” occasionally resurface in policy discussions.

Insiders reveal the calculus: contractors deliver velocity and insulation. Uniformed forces bog down in bureaucracy; private entities innovate faster, absorb risks, and shield governments from direct blowback. But attribution shatters when a grid falters or secrets leak, does the trail lead to Fort Meade or a Virginia boardroom?

Capt. Sarah Miller and Tech. Sgt. Carrol Brewster, 834th Cyber Operations Squadron, discuss options in response to a staged cyber attack during filming of a scene for an Air Force Reserve Command mission video at Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland, Texas, on June 1, 2019. The video, which is currently in production, will also be filmed at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska; and Colorado Springs, Colorado. The completed video will portray Reserve Airmen conducting multi-domain operations across air, space and cyberspace, and is scheduled to premiere later this year. (U.S. Air Force Photo by Maj. Christopher Vasquez)

Shadows in the East and Gulf: Proxies and Persistent Threats

Russia’s ecosystem blends state oversight with mercenary flexibility. Wagner’s fractured remnants reorganized under Pavel Prigozhin post-2023 mutiny, retain cyber adjuncts tied to military intelligence units, supporting hybrid activities that blend physical and digital elements, particularly in resource-rich regions. Lesser players like RSB Group advertise offensive services openly.

In the Gulf, the well-documented Project Raven stands as the grim blueprint. Ex-NSA talent wielded zero-click iPhone exploits against dissidents, journalists, rivals and even Americans. Fallout echoed into the 2020s: three operatives surrendered clearances, paid millions to dodge prison. Yet the model proliferates authoritarian regimes buying turnkey digital repression.

The Israeli Connection: NSO Group and the Spyware Export Empire

Israel dominates the commercial cyber sectors, with NSO Group long at the forefront despite persistent controversy. Pegasus, its signature tool, infiltrates smartphones with zero-click precision, granting full access to messages, cameras, microphones, and location data. Marketed exclusively to governments for counter-terrorism, it has repeatedly surfaced in abuses against journalists, activists, dissidents, and opposition figures across dozens of countries.

Despite U.S. blacklisting in 2021 and a string of lawsuits culminating in Meta’s 2025 victory forcing NSO to pay substantial damages (initially $168 million, later adjusted) the company endures. In October 2025, a U.S.-led consortium headed by Hollywood producer Robert Simonds acquired controlling stakes, injecting fresh capital while pledging reforms to court American regulators. Co-founder Shalev Hulio, meanwhile, launched Dream Security, a $1 billion-valued successor drawing ex-NSO talent and targeting similar markets.

The persistence of these firms reflects sustained international demand, even as export regimes and human-rights reviews come under scrutiny. The business model, high-margin licensing with strict client confidentiality has influenced a broader ecosystem of commercial offensive tools.

The Exploding Global Hack-for-Hire Bazaar

A $12–20 billion shadow market pulses beneath: syndicates peddle access-as-a-service, spyware, full campaigns. AI democratizes entry; barriers collapse as tools scale. “Ethical” red-teaming masks corporate espionage or regime enforcement.

Criminal Convergence: When Ransomware Gangs Hire PMC-Level Talent

The line between state-backed mercenaries and pure criminal syndicates blurs fastest in ransomware. What began as opportunistic encryption scams has professionalized into a gig economy where gangs recruit elite talent, often the same developers, pentesters, and access brokers who moonlight for PMCs or nation-states.

Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) platforms operate like startups: core developers lease malware kits to affiliates who handle intrusions, while specialized “contractors” provide initial access via exploited credentials or zero-days. Dark-web forums brim with six-figure offers, complete with bonuses, paid leave, and performance incentives for coders, negotiators, and money launderers. Groups like Conti (pre-disruption) even maintained HR departments and reference checks.

Economic desperation fuels this convergence: laid-off tech workers turn to underground bounties when legitimate jobs dry up. The result? Attacks grow more sophisticated, blending mercenary-grade persistence with criminal greed. A single breach can net millions, funded by bitcoin trails that loop through mixers run by the same networks.

This hybridization erodes deterrence further, criminals gain state-level tools, while proxies adopt profit motives. Victims face not just extortion, but potential data weaponization in geopolitical plays.

The 2026 Horizon: Surging Budgets and Escalating Risks

As 2026 unfolds, the NDAA’s $15.1 billion cyber budget signals a new era of privatization, with debates raging over “hack back” authorizations that could let firms conduct offensive ops independently. Trump’s emerging national cybersecurity strategy emphasizes public-private partnerships, potentially expanding PMC roles in preemptive strikes. Yet this raises alarms: with AI accelerating tool development, the risk of uncontrolled escalation, so-called “cyber blowback” looms larger, where a private hack spirals into international crisis.

Consequences cascade. Deterrence crumbles when attackers cloak behind NDAs and offshore shells. Escalation spirals in hybrids: private drone swarms on hacked feeds, grids blacked out as “accidents.” Norms lag; export controls on dual-use tools remain porous.

States must counter aggressively: sanction vendors, mandate contract transparency, forge coalitions against proliferators. Otherwise, these digital warlords dictate the battlefield.

In the end, mercenaries have always exploited the gaps states dare not fill outright. Cyberspace amplifies their edge: infinite reach, ephemeral traces, strikes that echo eternally.

They call it strategy, this patient theft of tomorrow’s secrets; but in the hollow hour before the qubits sing, the harvester senses the approaching specter, the pale, persistent guilt of the extraordinary man who discovered, too late, that some locks were meant to remain forever closed.

Sources: